Are you a GPAI provider, and which obligation tier applies

Methodology: map · optional AI · human review

GpaiWatch maps a described model and release practice to the Article 53 and Article 55 obligation tiers, and lists what each tier requires. Decision-support only — not legal advice.

1. What the engine owns

Deterministic lines with cited articles, conditional triggers, and a provider demand checklist. Demo is labelled Rule-based — never silent mock.

2. What optional AI may do

Polish wording when a key is configured. Upstream failure returns 502. No invented legal conclusions or conformity claims.

3. What you must do

  • Verify against Regulation (EU) 2024/1689 primary text.
  • Keep humans accountable for oversight assignments and notices.
  • Track the Annex III timeline against the consolidated text before you rely on a date.

4. What we deliberately do not do

  • Broad TPRM / CVE monitoring (that dilutes the Act-focused moat).
  • Replace VendorVet vendor screening — use VendorVet before you buy.
  • Legal advice, CE marking, or the official EU Compliance Checker.

Open studio

Was this result helpful?Feedback